Reviews of scotch and world whiskies by a history professor, his wife, bird, and three cats.

Bowmore 1997 Distillery Manger’s Selection 22 Year

Bowmore 1997 Distillery Manger’s Selection 22 Year

Whisky : Bowmore 1997 Distillery Manger’s Selection 22 Year

Country/Region : Scotland/Islay

ABV : 51.7%

Cask : First fill Oloroso Sherry Hogshead (bottle 1702/3000)

Age : 22 Years (1997-2019)

Tasting : Neat in a Glencairn @ Peat Whisky Preview

Nose : Burning incense, rosemary, and dried pine needles.  Lovely and rich, the nose begins with delicate, but sinus clearing herbal notes.  A dark, concentrated, and salty umami slowly emerges; it is dark shoyu, black vinegar, or blackened sea salt.  Black plums and juicy stone fruits lurk in the background.

Palate :  A sweet and syrupy body that opens with pungent rich sandalwood.  If there was such thing as a wood bomb (though without the astringency that might imply), this would be it.  Notes of cherry, dark chocolate, and espresso; there is a rich bitterness that follows the wood.  Sweeter notes of concentrated sun dried fruits or straw/raisin wine like Amarone are syrupy and thick.  Wonderfully complex as it hits different notes across the palate.

Finish : More typical Bowmore notes of tar, salt, and old leather emerge on the backend and linger on the finish.  


Score : 9

Mental Imagine : Midnight Mass on Christmas Eve.  Snow blows on the cold wind outside

Something Similar (but worse) :  Bowmore 12 Year Exclusive Malts (heavier sherry funk, younger peat, a young teen to this bottles mature adult)

Something Much Worse : Bowmore 15 Year ‘Darkest’ (much lighter body, quicker finish)


Notes : I honestly want to claim on the nose that I smell snow.  I did not write that above because the thought of it is absurd.  I know people can smell rain based on slight chemical shifts in the atmosphere, but I have never before thought I could smell a snow coming.  Maybe it is the pine and the incense— the memory of a Christmas Mass that gives the impression of the faintly sweet and fresh smell of snow. The nose is so complex that I kept coming back to it over and over again.  Even after I started sipping the dram, I noticed I kept subconsciously nosing the glass and I would realize I was not taking notes on the palate— I was stuck on the aroma.  The two senses are of course tightly linked, but I like to try to differentiate the experience as best I can.

This was absolutely stunning.  It was wonderfully complex.  It was not overly sweet, overly funky, or overly influenced by the oloroso.  It was a goldilocks dram, hitting so many different notes so well.  If it had one major weakness it would be on the finish.  If the finish was a bit longer or matched the palate a bit more, it would have been stunning.  However, the finish is the only thing that really reminds you that this is a Bowmore and there is certainly some virtue in the distinctness of the distillery saying hello at some point.

Is this worth buying?  I suppose that depends on whether or not you find dropping $600 on a bottle to be jaw dropping, head shaking, potentially doable, or no big thing.  I did give this an A- and it is easily without a doubt the best Bowmore I have ever had, but I am not in the habit of spending even half this bottle’s going price on a scotch.  If you figure the Bowmore ‘Darkest’ 15 Year to be around $80, a dram to which I gave a D, is it worth the 7.5x higher price tag to hit an A?  Maybe...?  Honestly this bottle sits just outside my preferred flavor range, it is absolutely excellent, but it scratches an itch I do not have.  If $600 sounds like a reasonable sum to you— or you just need an absolutely lovely heavily sherried well-aged peated dram— this might be for you.  If money was no issue, I would happily keep this in my closet to take out for discerning drinkers.

Cragganmore 13 Year SMWS 37.81 “Orange turmeric margarita”

Cragganmore 13 Year SMWS 37.81 “Orange turmeric margarita”

Peat Faerie 3rd ed.; SMWS Blended Scotch

Peat Faerie 3rd ed.; SMWS Blended Scotch